Employers anticipating an inspection by the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration under a national emphasis program should prepare
well in advance to protect against potential liability, an attorney
who represents employer interests said July 15.
First, they should conduct an internal compliance audit under
privilege to protect their work product from discovery during
potential future litigation, Michael T. Taylor, an associate with
Arent Fox LLP, said during a BNA audioconference on national emphasis
programs. The review should focus on the particular emphasis program
the employer is subject to, he said.
Second, employers should assemble and train an inspection team to
manage an anticipated or potential inspection, equipping it with
sufficient photography and video equipment, he said.
Third, before an inspection, employers should gather all documents
relevant to the emphasis program and make copies to provide to OSHA,
he said.
By taking these three steps, the company will show it takes safety
and health issues seriously and OSHA compliance officers will spend
less time on the inspection, Taylor said.
National emphasis programs, authorized by the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970, offer OSHA a way to use its finite resources
in enforcing compliance with workplace health and safety standards.
OSHA is able to inspect only about 1 percent to 2 percent of the
approximately 7.5 million work sites in the United States.
The agency has two types of inspections: unprogrammed and
programmed, Richard Fairfax, director of OSHA's enforcement programs,
said during the audioconference. He said unprogrammed inspections,
which follow fatalities, employee complaints, or imminent danger, are
limited in scope.
Programmed inspections, on the other hand, are planned inspections
aimed at industries deemed to have a high potential for injuries,
illnesses, or fatalities, he said.
Among the agency's various inspection programs, OSHA has developed
eight national emphasis programs that include silica, petroleum
refineries, and amputations, Fairfax said. The agency plans to launch
another to cover chemical plants. The agency has another 140 to 150
local emphasis programs designed and implemented at the local level,
Fairfax said.
Not Welcomed by Employers.
Taylor said employers do not welcome OSHA's emphasis programs at
either the local or national levels. The programs not only create a
disruption in business operations but, he said, can lead to disclosure
of trade secrets.
Most significantly, they can lead to “enormous abatement
costs” for companies to correct alleged violations, he said.
Emphasis programs also subjects companies to follow-up inspections,
Taylor said.
Some industries, such as the 81 oil refineries in the United
States, know they will be subject to inspections, Taylor told BNA
after the conference. Since there are 28,000 chemical companies,
however, and only 1,100 OSHA inspectors, individual chemical companies
do not know whether they will be inspected, he said.
Three other speakers on the audioconference panel disagreed with
Taylor, saying OSHA's emphasis programs are a welcome part of its
enforcement.
Find, Fix Hazards.
Michael Wright, who heads the health, safety, and environment
department of the United Steelworkers, agreed with Taylor that
companies should conduct a comprehensive audit focused on an
anticipated emphasis program audit. The should do so not to avoid
liability but to “find hazards and then fix what's hazardous to
save lives,” he said.
Wright said most workers welcome national emphasis programs because
they “think OSHA is there to protect them,” he said.
The programs, however, do not replace the need for standards, he
said, mentioning in particular the need for a standard on combustible
dust. OSHA could begin with a national emphasis program based on
existing standards that cover combustible dust, Wright said. The
program could be a precursor to a rulemaking, he said.
After a rule is issued, another emphasis program could be conducted
to see how the rule is working, he said.
Fairfax said the emphasis programs have been “very
successful,” and have significantly reduced occupational
hazards. When the programs are launched, OSHA gives companies
sufficient compliance information and training assistance and
“plenty of time” to prepare for potential inspections, he
said.
John Bresland, chairman of the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board, also endorsed OSHA's emphasis programs. The board
will continue to conduct “strong investigations” on those
incidents that will provide the most useful safety recommendations to
OSHA, he said.
By Patricia Ware
Copyright 2008, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.