Skip banner
BNA's Environment, Health & Safety Professional Information CenterEHS Store
Homewww.bna.comSearchContact The Editor

BNA Catalog
About Chemical Regulation Reporter®
Environment & Safety Products

EHS Compliance Spotlight On..
EHS Audioconferences
What's New (username and password required to view the contents)
EHS Partners
Web Hot Links

Free Trial Chemical Regulation Reporter®

Print Document

Volume: 33 Number: 43
November 02, 2009



EPA Proposes Revisions to Rule On Renovation, Repair, Painting

The Environmental Protection Agency proposed revisions Oct. 28 to the 2008 Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule to increase its protection of children and adults (74 Fed. Reg. 55,506).

EPA is proposing to increase the number of pre-1978 homes where lead renovations would be subject to safety precautions, including minimizing dust, containing work areas, and conducting a thorough cleanup to reduce exposure associated with disturbing lead-based paint. The federal government banned lead-based paint from homes in 1978.

EPA also will propose to require renovators to provide the owner and occupant (if the occupant is a different party) with records documenting compliance with the rule.

“The proposed rule will further increase protections for children and their families from lead-based paint hazards associated with home renovation and repair,” said Steve Owens, assistant EPA administrator for prevention, pesticides, and toxic substances, in a statement issued Oct. 22.

The proposed rule comes on top of the agency's announcement that it will propose to revise its hazard standard for lead in dust and to work with the Department of Housing and Urban Development to revise the regulatory definition of lead-based paint (33 CRR 1049, 10/26/09).

That action resulted from a petition filed by housing and environmental advocacy groups. Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act authorizes individuals and groups to petition the agency for rulemaking. If EPA decides the hazard standard or regulatory definition need to be revised, it would have to propose those changes in a future Federal Register notice.

Proposal to Eliminate Regulatory Exemption.

The Oct. 28 proposed rule revising the 2008 Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule would eliminate what EPA refers to as the “opt-out” provision.

That provision allowed renovators to opt out, or be exempted from, the training and work requirements of the rule. Firms could be exempted if they obtained a certification from the owner that no child under 6 and no pregnant woman resided in the residence.

The opt-out provision fails to protect older children and adults, who also can be harmed by lead, EPA said in its Oct. 28 Federal Register notice.

The provision does not protect children who might be exposed to lead from renovations occurring when they visit their grandparents' home, EPA said. It also fails to protect pregnant women or young children who lived adjacent to a property that is being renovated, the agency said.

EPA requested comments on the appropriateness of removing the opt-out provision from the Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule.

The agency also seeks comment on alternative approaches it could use to enhance the protections offered by the renovation, repair, and painting rule.

More Recordkeeping Obligations.

EPA is proposing to increase recordkeeping requirements to the rule. When a final invoice for the renovation is delivered, or within 30 days of completion--whichever is earlier--the renovation firm would have to provide information demonstrating its compliance with the rule to the building's owner and, if different, the occupants of the house or child-occupied facility, EPA said.

If a firm uses dust sampling to determine final levels of the renovated home or facility, the firm would be required to make those records available to the residents or parents and guardians of a child-care facility, EPA said.

EPA is proposing additional changes affecting training.

EPA estimates the revised renovation, repair, and painting rule would cost about $500 million in the first year. That cost would decrease to about $300 million starting with the second year, when improved test kits for detecting lead-based paint are expected to be available, the agency said.

EPA seeks comment on how it can fully quantify the benefits of the proposed rule. The benefits result from the prevention of adverse health effects such as impaired cognitive function in children along with heart problems and decreased kidney function that can occur in children and adults, EPA said.

The proposed rule resulted, EPA said, from a legal settlement it reached Aug. 29 with environmental and children's health advocacy groups that had challenged the 2008 rule.

EPA will undertake three separate rulemakings to expand coverage and strengthen requirements of the 2008 rule, which will take full effect on April 22, 2010, according to information posted on the lead section of the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics' website.

Comments on the proposed revisions to the 2008 Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule are due Nov. 27.

They should be marked EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049 and submitted through http://www.regulations.gov.

By Pat Rizzuto


For additional information on the proposed revisions to the 2008 Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule, contact Marc Edmonds in EPA's National Program Chemicals Division, Office of Pollution and Prevention and Toxics, at (202) 566-0758 or at edmonds.marc@epa.gov.


Copyright 2009, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.


Print Document

Contact Customer Relations at customercare@bna.com
Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com
1801 S. Bell Street, Arlington, VA 22202 - Phone: 1-800-372-1033

Copyright © 2009 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright FAQs     Internet Privacy Policy     License Terms
Disclaimer     Reprint Permissions     BNA Accessibility Statement