An interim guidance document for health care workers who might be
exposed to plague during a bioterrorism attack has been withdrawn for
additional review and discussion, a Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention spokesman confirmed April 12.
The guidelines drew immediate fire from labor unions, who in an
April 11 letter called on CDC Director Julie Gerberding to withdraw
what they termed an "irresponsible" interim guidance.
The unions said they were "greatly disturbed" by CDC's
guidelines, which they claim would put health care workers at risk of
serious and potentially deadly exposure.
CDC spokesman Von Roebuck told BNA there has been comment on the
guideline since they went up on the centers Web site a week ago,
including calls from hospitals.
A National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health spokesman
told BNA April 12 that CDC recognized that additional review and
discussion would be needed on the guidelines. The guidance was posted
because there were questions about how to protect healthcare workers
during the TOPOFF 3 exercises--a comprehensive terrorism response
exercises held last week in Connecticut and New Jersey (35 OSHR 309,
4/7/05).
Earlier Guidance Available.
Without the interim guidance, the NIOSH spokesman said, people
could refer to the existing guidance from 1999, the "Bioterrorism
Readiness Plan: A Template for Healthcare Facilities," which can
be found at http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/plague.
The NIOSH spokesman also said there will be a response to the
AFL-CIO letter.
In its letter to CDC, the AFL-CIO According to the letter from the
AFL-CIO to said: "The guidance is completely at odds with
scientific evidence, legal requirements under the Occupational Safety
and Health Act, existing [National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health] and OSHA guidance and recommendations for protecting
responders, and the Worker Safety and Health Support Annex of the
National Response Plan issued in December 2004."
Signed by Peg Seminario, director of occupational safety and health
for the AFL-CIO, the letter was written on behalf of the American
Federation of Government Employees; American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees; American Federation of Teachers;
Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO; Communications
Workers of America; International Association of Firefighters;
International Brotherhood of Teamsters; United Auto Workers; Service
Employees International Union; United American Nurses; United Food and
Commercial Workers; and United Steelworkers of
America.
Event Could Suspend Rules.
On April 4, CDC issued its "Guidance for Protecting Health
Care Workers Caring for Patients Potentially Exposed to Aerosolized
Yersinia pestis from a Bioterrorism Event." The guidelines
said that in a large bioterrorism event, circumstances "may
require the suspension of some of the respiratory protection
requirements found in the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration Respiratory Standards (29 CFR 1910.134), such as fit
testing and medical clearance" (35 OSHR 309, 4/7/05).
OSHA's respiratory protection standard requires that fit tests be
conducted for those workers who must wear respiratory protection.
According to the unions, there is "NO scientific or medical
evidence, historical or contemporary, that has demonstrated" that
a surgical mask-- recommended by CDC to be sufficient to protect
healthcare workers--provides adequate
protection.
Misperception of Airborne Agents.
"Furthermore, there is a widely held misperception within the
infection control community and perpetuated by the CDC that many
biological agents are exclusively droplet transmitted, not
airborne," the letter said. It cited a CDC workshop on
respiratory protection for airborne infectious agents held in November
2004, which demonstrated that "this is simply a false and
misleading dichotomy."
The letter also said:
• NIOSH
Interim Recommendations for the Selection and Use of Protective
Clothing and Respirators Against Biological Agents specify the use of
powered air purifying respirators or a NIOSH-approved pressure demand
self contained breathing apparatus.
• The
NIOSH minimum level of protection is similar to the level of
respiratory protection recommended by OSHA in its Best Practices for
Hospital Based Receivers of Victims from Mass Casualty Incidents
Involving the Release of Hazardous Substances, issued in January.
• The
Worker Safety and Health Support Annex of the National Response Plan
issued in 2004 to which the Department of Health and Human
Services--CDC's parent agency--is a signatory, states that
" 'developing, implementing, and monitoring an incident
personal protective equipment program, including the selection, use,
and decontamination of PPE; implementation of a respiratory fit-test
program; and distribution of PPE,' is a key part of a response plan to
protect workers in the event of a major incident, including a
bioterrorist attack."
In addition, the letter said the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, clearly demonstrated the need for adequate PPE. The lack of
respiratory protection equipment, proper fit testing or training,
resulted in "extensive and serious adverse respiratory
effects" among many firefighters and others who responded, it
said.
If health care workers are not provided with the proper equipment,
they cannot be expected to participate and respond in the event of a
bioterrorism attack, the letter said. "As was clearly
demonstrated during the failed smallpox vaccination program, absent
adequate protection, participation will not occur," the letter
added.
By Ellen Byerrum